This is a reworking of an old post with clearer language and better examples
Last semester was my first time teaching aural skills in NYU’s new popular music theory sequence. This semester will be my first time teaching a full-fledged theory class in the sequence. When I have taught music theory in the past, I have always used a lot of examples from Anglo-American pop, but it’s nice to be in a program that is committed to putting that music front and center. This raises a question, though: what is “popular” music theory? Isn’t music theory just music theory? Why should NYU create a whole alternative theory sequence for pop? The short answer is that Anglo-American popular music operates by very different rules and conventions than Western European tonal music.
It’s a cliche to say that American music is a combination of European harmony and African rhythm. However, a substantial amount of Anglo-American pop harmony is African-descended. The blues has especially strong African retentions. (It’s a problem that theory curricula are so heavily weighted toward harmony and voice leading. We need to include much more rhythm, form and timbre in theory class! But that is a discussion for another post.) You can understand the difference between blues harmony and Western European harmony by looking at the evolution of blues harmonica.
Continue reading “The harmonica as a metaphor for pop music theory”