Dancing to Michael Jackson with my kids

I have a longstanding musical relationship with Michael Jackson. There’s nothing remarkable about that; many people do. Like the rest of my age cohort, Michael entered my consciousness with Thriller in the early 1980s. Aside from a period in my teens and young adulthood, he has rarely been out of my ears since. The relationship took on a new significance when my kids got interested in him, though “interested” is not the right word to describe their obsession. Milo, at age five, will listen to “Beat It” or “Billie Jean” on endless repeat for literally hours at a time. Bernadetta, age two, asks for “Beat It” by name—it’s one of two song titles she knows, along with “Yellow Submarine.” At her second birthday party, she insisted on dancing to “Beat It” rather than opening her presents.

Michael Jackson by Paul Bedard

Like me, my kids are not unusual. All babies and little kids love Michael Jackson. They love any kind of upbeat rhythmic music, but there’s something specific to Michael, with or without the Jackson 5, that grabs them especially strongly. As much fun as it is to see my kids dancing or singing to him or learning to moonwalk, though, I dread the day when they get old enough to start asking deeper questions. As the expression goes, Michael is a problematic fave. He was repeatedly and plausibly accused of child abuse, and while he was never convicted, his behavior with kids was questionable at the very least. There’s also the matter of Michael’s own abusive childhood, with the uncomfortable spectacle of a prepubescent boy doing the work of a man. Even if I shield my children from all of that, they will see pictures online, and I will need to answer difficult questions about the gruesome results of his many plastic surgeries.

So, Michael is problematic, but he remains my favorite. I have seen his music bring groups of old, self-conscious white people to their feet to dance who would never dance otherwise. This is not a small accomplishment. Social dance is an essential emotional vitamin, one which white Americans are starved of. Its absence shows itself in our collective unhappiness as surely as vitamin deficiencies show in stunted bone growth. Michael couldn’t use his music to make himself happy, but he has made uncountably many other people happy, including me and my family.

As a child myself, I remember particularly loving “Beat It.” I could only understand a few of the lyrics aside from the title phrase. But I understood the guitar riff and the beat, the urgency and anger in Michael’s voice, and the authority and power of the musicianship. I couldn’t have told you then why I thought that the song sounded so good, but I knew that it did. As an adult with an advanced and broad music education, I can tell you about the song’s musical structure, the layering of the instruments, and the innovative mixing and equalization. But that’s just putting technical detail to the emotional reactions I was already having clearly when I was seven.

I lost touch with Michael as I entered adolescence and became too “cool” for pop music. This coincided with a steep falloff in the quality of Michael’s music, and his hold on popular culture generally. I more or less forgot about him until my freshman year of college. It was the end of the spring semester, a warm and sunny day in May. People were mostly done with their work and were sitting around on the grass. Two musicians I knew, Harris and Stefan, brought out instruments and started jamming. Stefan had his upright bass—he was and is an excellent jazz bassist. Harris had his mandolin, one of many instruments he played astonishingly well. He started picking out “Beat It”, and Stephan jumped in immediately. I still have a photo of them playing it. Harris was one of my first and best music teachers. He killed himself ten years after the picture was taken. I saw him a few months before it happened. He was in graduate school for composition, making experimental music, and he seemed extremely unhappy about it. I wonder whether Harris would have done better if he had played more dance music, or whether, like Michael, joyful music wouldn’t have been enough to save him.

In the mid-2000s, I met a singer and DJ named Barbara. Although she went to music school, her main strength as a musician is having a close intuition for where pop music is headed. In 2008, she suggested that I listen to some Michael Jackson, and not just to Thriller, but to his later albums too. I did, for the first time in several years, and was dazzled by what I heard. I sampled the opening drum groove from “Billie Jean,” and we used it under many of our own tracks. This got me interested in other people’s sample-based music. I did a series of art projects I called sample maps, “family trees” of hip-hop breakbeats, and posted them on the web. They included one I made for Michael, who has always been a go-to sample source for rap producers. In 2009, when Michael died, the world rediscovered his music, and Barbara looked like a visionary. My sample map got picked up by blogs, social media, and then mainstream news outlets. It put me on the map as a pop music scholar, a professional identity I’ve been building ever since.

I teach music technology at NYU and Montclair State University. No one exactly knows what “music technology” is, so I choose to teach “vernacular music made with computers.” The longer I do this work, the less time I spend on the technology, and the more time I spend on music itself—recorded and studio-centric music like pop, rock, techno, and hip-hop. Michael’s recordings are a backbone of my syllabus. I found some multitrack stems from Off The Wall and Thriller, which are invaluable teaching resources. I devote the most class time to ”Beat It.” This is not because it’s musically the most interesting Michael song—quite the opposite, in fact. The harmony is simple, the structure is predictable, the melody is just a few riffs, and the beat is a straightforward rock groove. On paper, the song looks like it should be boring. And yet, it isn’t at all. The production must therefore be doing a lot of the musical heavy lifting.

Listening to the stems shows how rich and densely layered the soundscape of “Beat It” really is. There are three separate drum stems—a programmed pattern on the Linndrum, Jeff Porcaro playing live drum kit, and another stem of extra snare. In addition, there’s also some miscellaneous percussion, including Michael thumping on an empty instrument case. These tracks all blend together seamlessly because Bruce Swedian, the mix engineer, filtered all of the high end out of the drum machine, and the low end out of the kit. In isolation, they sound absurdly bottom- and top-heavy, respectively, but they fit together in the full mix like yin and yang. The iconic guitar part is similarly layered, blending several distinct tones together, including some subtle background parts beyond the big main riff: jazz octaves, staccato plucks, pick slides.

The greatest revelation in the multitracks is the keyboard stem. There are at least seven different keyboard sounds: a digital-sounding emulation of electric piano with a pitch wobble at the end, an analog “wow” sound doubling the guitar riff, string and choir pads, a helicopter-like arpeggiated drone, and most famously, the Synclavier bell sound that starts the song off. Aside from the bell, all these keyboards are mixed subtly. You can listen to the song many times and never even register their presence. But if you take them away, the rest of the music feels flat and lifeless. This is due in large part to the rhythmic interplay between the keyboards and the guitars. The keyboard parts are all on strong beats, while the guitar and bass riffs emphasize the weak beats. The track is full of such nuances, revealing “Beat It” to be more complex than its musical surface would suggest.

“Beat It” stands out from the rest of Thriller because it’s the only rock song. That makes it a conspicuous exception to Michael’s more typically “black” blend of funk, disco and R&B. Quincy Jones apparently pushed the song in a rock direction with the specific intention of appealing to white listeners, and I am living proof that this strategy was successful. It’s possible that Michael and Quincy Jones were also making a comment on rock itself. While it was a solidly white genre in 1982, rock had been the near-exclusive province of black musicians only a few decades earlier. It became popular because of Elvis Presley, but it was invented by artists like Chuck Berry, T-Bone Walker, Sister Rosetta Tharpe, Bo Diddley, and Carl Hogan, the guitarist in Louis Jordan’s Tympany Five. You can trace a line from Hogan through Berry and Ike Turner, and from there to Jimi Hendrix. Nelson George (2010) points out that Hendrix learned his flamboyant showmanship from his time playing R&B on the “chitlin circuit.” George compares this deep-rooted uninhibited performance tradition to P-Funk, to Prince, and above all, to Michael Jackson:

As a performer, Hendrix, like Jackson years later, placed the lessons of flamboyance he had learned in black show business in front of white audiences. That both were eccentric geniuses made these crossover moves seem less like calculations and more like projections of their rich fantasy lives. Hendrix dreamed of castles made of sand; Jackson imagined Hollywood noirs in which he was the blessed redeemer (116-117).

While “Beat It” reclaims black rock, beneath the guitars it also functions as electronic dance music. The first twenty seconds of the song contain nothing but synthesizers and a drum machine. Before Eddie Van Halen’s guitar solo, there’s a sixteen bar section that’s just groove, all rhythm and abstract textures with no melody or harmony. These two sections are the parts that sound the freshest and most contemporary to my adult ears.

I can’t explain exactly what my kids hear in “Beat It,” but it has inspired them to start doing regular dance parties. While the song plays on infinite repeat, they turn off the lights, shine flashlights on some miniature disco balls my wife hung up, and jump around like monkeys. My son is also fascinated with the music video, which shows some not-very-tough-looking “tough guys” doing a choreographed street fight inspired by West Side Story. Milo sees Michael as the hero of this story, trying to stop everyone from fighting. I wish he could think of Michael that way forever, and not have to confront the complicated and sometimes ugly truth.

References

George, N. (2011). Thriller: The Musical Life of Michael Jackson. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.

Hein, E. (2009). The Michael Jackson sample map goes viral. Retrieved February 5, 2018, from https://ethanhein.com/wp/2009/the-michael-jackson-sample-map-goes-viral/

5 replies on “Dancing to Michael Jackson with my kids”

  1. Ethan, I appreciate the great things you said about Michael’s music in the early and mid-eighties, and I love reading about the impression it has made on your kids, and how you have seen its impact on people who might otherwise never get up and dance to the beat. I’ve seen – and been a part of that, too. However, I dispute that there was a “steep falloff in the quality of Michael’s music” that corresponded with your teenage years. My personal opinion is that his music from the 90s onwards is by far the most interesting, complex and even challenging that he recorded. The “Dangerous” album is a masterpiece, and some of the material on HIStory is the most important (I believe) Michael ever recorded – including “They Don’t Care About Us” and “Earth Song”. The new material on “Blood on the Dance Floor” makes what is generally termed a re-mix album just about my favourite, given the material it contains from Michael’s “Ghosts” film, as well as the title track – one of his most danceable – and “Morphine”. Invincible gave us so many colours and musical styles, and some incredible vocals, and, according to his collaborator Brad Buxer, the material he was working on near the end of his life was better than anything he’d previously done – high praise from a man who had worked with Michael around the keyboard as well as on stage during the Dangerous and HIStory tours, and who had been in Stevie Wonder’s touring band before working for Michael. Your concerns about the allegations made against Michael are understandable, especially coming from a parent, but are part of a much larger picture of the way society (and especially the corridors of power in most industries) deal with their tall poppies. They ruthlessly cut them down, and even when the evidence reveals otherwise, we are constantly reminded of the innocent person’s transgressions almost every time their name appears in print – usually with no reference to the fact that they were exonerated by a total lack of evidence. Susan Woodward’s book “Otherness and Power: Michael Jackson and his Media Critics” exposes this behaviour by assessing what some of these critics have had to say. Even when, in Michael’s case, the allegations aren’t mentioned, the plastic surgery is… as though it was something unique to him, and that he had so much of it over the years his face was falling apart (or, to reference another enduring tabloid myth) his nose was disintegrating or had fallen off. Somehow the coroner missed that one! As a mature-aged female MJ fan, I actually consider Michael to have been very attractive in his 30s, 40s and at 50 years of age. Read “Desire” in Susan Fast’s book on “Dangerous” in the 33-1/3 series to appreciate what myself and quite a lot of other MJ fans feel on the subject. It’s also worth considering why both L’Omo Vogue and Ebony magazine (in 2007) would risk large cover features of Michael at age 49 if they didn’t think his appearance would bear up under the scrutiny. Of course, there are bad photos – but God save us all from being judged by bad paparazzi images. I trust your son when he is old enough, will look for the truth behind the headlines, and discover that, despite the complexities, contradictions and what appears to non-geniuses to be eccentricities, the truth about Michael Jackson is not ugly. And his legacy is, in fact, a triumph over the dark designs of those, for reasons of their own greed, jealousy or just plain insensitivity, wanted to bring him down. The truth (which is anything but ugly) is that they failed, while the artist and his art have become immortal.

    1. I do like some of Michael’s later material a lot, but it does get to be uneven, and there’s certainly nothing on the level of Thriller later on. It’s a problem that a lot of major artists suffer – when they’re on the way up, they’re hungry, competitive and driven. Also, they’re resource-constrained, which forces them to be collaborative and inventive. When they’re at the top, they’re comfortable and complacent, and having unlimited resources can be as much of a creative hindrance as anything else. I think there’s a good comparison to be made here with Star Wars vs The Phantom Menace, or Revolver vs recent Paul McCartney albums.

      Michael’s ability to reach substantial financial settlements with his accusers is not quite the same thing as exoneration. I revere him as an artist, but he obviously had a lot of emotional problems stemming from his own childhood, and it manifested in some behavior that, like I said, is questionable at the very least. It might not be criminal for an adult man to share a bed with kids who aren’t related to him, but there’s no way on earth I would let my kids do it. As to Michael’s face, I mean, tastes differ, but his appearance toward the end there makes me sad above all. I hear what you’re saying about tall poppies, and lord knows Michael faced plenty of racist treatment in his life. But let’s not imagine he was a really happy and strongly centered individual.

      1. Ethan,
        I understand your concerns about MJ’s comment regarding sharing his bed”, let me clarify them for you. When he said he shared his bed, he meant that he allowed his personal guests (men, women, or kids) to sleep in his bed if they wanted to, and when they did he would sleep on the floor, or in the 2nd floor of his two story bedroom suite. MJ and his guests stayed up late pretty often, watching tv or playing videogames, and sometimes they’d just crash there in his bedroom. Typically, his guests slept in their own guest units.

        In the crock-umentary with Martin Bashir, MJ was ambushed into the subject when Bashir (without MJ’s permission) told Gavin Arvizo (a cancer stricken kid who visited Neverland and slept in MJ’s bed) to hold MJ’s hand and place his head on MJ’s shoulder, and when he did he started filming and asking questions about where Gavin slept. MJ let him sleep in his bed because Gavin asked him, and had permission from his mother. Gavin and his family (mom and 2 siblings) were dirt poor, and they all lived in studio apartment, and didn’t have their own beds. So when he saw MJ’s bed, he was enamored by it and wanted to sleep in it, and MJ let him so that he could be happy. MJ and his assistant slept on the floor in sleeping bags.

        It was only MJ’s closest friends and family who spent nights at Neverland; when kids visited Neverland, they went their on field trips during the day. They were chaperoned and monitored at all times, and once they were finished playing on MJ’s rides, they left. The only reason Gavin and his family spent the night at Neverland is because it was his wish to meet MJ while he fought cancer, and MJ invited his entire family to spend a weekend there. After the first night, they slept in guest units the remaining time there.

        There are plenty of MJ’s friends and family who defended MJ on this issue before, during, and after the trial, as well as many employees who testified for MJ and defended him. NOBODY was ever “forced” to sleep in his bed or bedroom, and there were NEVER any strangers who slept in his bed (which is a misconception many people have.) It’s easy for people who aren’t knowledgeable about MJ to hear those comments and assume the worst. I’m not attacking you, Ethan; I’m trying to educate you.

        Please listen to this interview, beginning at the 5 minute mark, to hear a close friend of MJ put his “bed sharing” comments into proper context and explain MJ’s rationale for being so generous to his guests. https://youtu.be/pUugIr8UH20

        Also, here’s a summary of that farce of a trial that MJ went through in 2005. He was 100% innocent. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-thomson/one-of-the-most-shameful_b_610258.html

Comments are closed.