<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biz Markie gets the copyright smackdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/2009/biz-markie-gets-the-copyright-smackdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/2009/biz-markie-gets-the-copyright-smackdown/</link>
	<description>Music, Technology, Evolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 15:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyga Recalled, Jay Z and Kanye West Settle: Hip Hop and the Sampling Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/2009/biz-markie-gets-the-copyright-smackdown/#comment-8632</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyga Recalled, Jay Z and Kanye West Settle: Hip Hop and the Sampling Dilemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/?p=1291#comment-8632</guid>
		<description>[...] sample at all. While this option saves the expense of preclearance and litigation, it also has a chilling effect on creativity and undermines the Constitutional principle behind copyright law, which is to promote [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sample at all. While this option saves the expense of preclearance and litigation, it also has a chilling effect on creativity and undermines the Constitutional principle behind copyright law, which is to promote [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American University Intellectual Property Brief &#187; Tyga Recalled, Jay Z and Kanye West Settle: Hip Hop and the Sampling Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/2009/biz-markie-gets-the-copyright-smackdown/#comment-8519</link>
		<dc:creator>American University Intellectual Property Brief &#187; Tyga Recalled, Jay Z and Kanye West Settle: Hip Hop and the Sampling Dilemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 04:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/?p=1291#comment-8519</guid>
		<description>[...] sample at all. While this option saves the expense of preclearance and litigation, it also has a chilling effect on creativity and undermines the Constitutional principle behind copyright law, which is to promote [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sample at all. While this option saves the expense of preclearance and litigation, it also has a chilling effect on creativity and undermines the Constitutional principle behind copyright law, which is to promote [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/2009/biz-markie-gets-the-copyright-smackdown/#comment-7472</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/?p=1291#comment-7472</guid>
		<description>Not just me! Millions of hip-hop fans the world over. 

Every remotely creative musician I know either makes sample-based music that they can&#039;t sell, or risks legal sanctions by going ahead and selling it anyway, or just experiences frustration at feeling like they can&#039;t explore this avenue commercially. I&#039;m in favor of copyright insofar as it motivates the creation of new work and takes reasonable measures to make sure creators get paid. Right now copyright law does a lot more inhibiting of new work than promoting it; mostly the law just encourages rent-seeking. I&#039;d be in favor of a compulsory licensing system for samples similar to the one that exists for cover songs. Copyright holders would get a reasonable fee but sampling musicians wouldn&#039;t have to negotiate each individual usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just me! Millions of hip-hop fans the world over. </p>
<p>Every remotely creative musician I know either makes sample-based music that they can&#8217;t sell, or risks legal sanctions by going ahead and selling it anyway, or just experiences frustration at feeling like they can&#8217;t explore this avenue commercially. I&#8217;m in favor of copyright insofar as it motivates the creation of new work and takes reasonable measures to make sure creators get paid. Right now copyright law does a lot more inhibiting of new work than promoting it; mostly the law just encourages rent-seeking. I&#8217;d be in favor of a compulsory licensing system for samples similar to the one that exists for cover songs. Copyright holders would get a reasonable fee but sampling musicians wouldn&#8217;t have to negotiate each individual usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pay 'em if you steal 'em</title>
		<link>http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/2009/biz-markie-gets-the-copyright-smackdown/#comment-7456</link>
		<dc:creator>Pay 'em if you steal 'em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethanhein.com/wp/?p=1291#comment-7456</guid>
		<description>YOU value Biz Markie&#039;s (stolen) music more than Gilbert O&#039;Sullivan&#039;s, so that makes our copyright system broken.  Yeah...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU value Biz Markie&#8217;s (stolen) music more than Gilbert O&#8217;Sullivan&#8217;s, so that makes our copyright system broken.  Yeah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

